Compromiso laboral e identificación con el propósito organizacional: Un estudio en el Senado Federal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2024.92710Palabras clave:
ropósito, propósito corporativo, demandas-recursos de trabajo, compromiso de los servidores públicos, motivación para el servicio público, Senado Federal.Resumen
Contextualización: La administración pública ha experimentado numerosas transformaciones a lo largo de las últimas décadas. El compromiso en el trabajo se consolida como un fenómeno central para comprender los resultados de los servidores y los mecanismos para mejorar la prestación de servicios públicos a los ciudadanos.
Objetivo: La presente investigación evaluó el impacto de la identificación con el propósito organizacional en el compromiso laboral de los servidores del Senado Federal de Brasil.
Método: Una muestra de 282 participantes respondió al cuestionario compuesto por medidas de ítems cerrados. Se llevaron a cabo análisis factorial confirmatorio y modelado de ecuaciones estructurales.
Resultados: Se comprobó que la identificación con el propósito organizacional ejerció una influencia positiva y fuerte en el compromiso de los servidores. El propósito organizacional resultó ser un antecedente importante, constituyendo, por tanto, un fenómeno central para comprender y discutir el engagement en el trabajo en el sector público.
Conclusiones: El presente estudio avanza al estimular el debate sobre el tema en el servicio público brasileño, contribuyendo con lagunas teórico-empíricas existentes en el campo y abriendo posibilidades para investigaciones futuras.
Citas
Andrade, D. C. T. (2020). Engajamento no trabalho no serviço público: Um modelo multicultural. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 24(1), 49-76. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2020190148
Bakker, A. B. (2014). Daily fluctuations in work engagement: An overview and current directions. European Psychologist, 19(4), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000160
Bergue, S. T. (2010). Gestão de pessoas em organizações públicas. Caxias do Sul, RS: Educs.
Borst, R. T., Kruyen, P. M., & Lako, C. J. (2019). Exploring the job demands-resources model of work engagement in government: Bringing in a psychological perspective. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3), 372-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17729870
Camões, M. R. S., Gomes, A. O., Rizardi, B., & Lemos, J. (2023). Os ciclos de engajamento no trabalho de servidores públicos federais. Revista de Administração Pública, 57(4), e2023-0061. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220230061
Christensen, R. K., Paarlberg, L., & Perry, J. L. (2017). Public service motivation research: Lessons for practice. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 529-542. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12796
Demo, G., Costa, A. C., & Coura, K. V. (2023). Human Resources Management Practices in the public service: Proposal of a measurement model. Rausp Management Journal, in press.
Ferreira, M. C., Valentini, F., Damásio, B. F., Mourão, L., Porto, J. B., Silva, R. C. C., & Pereira, M. M. (2016). Evidências adicionais de validade da UWES-9 em amostras brasileiras. Estudos de Psicologia, 21(4), 435-445. https://doi.org/10.5935/1678-4669.20160042
Field, A. (2018). Descobrindo a estatística usando o SPSS. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Fletcher, L., Bailey, C., Alfes, K., & Madden, A. (2020). Mind the context gap: A critical review of engagement within the public sector and an agenda for future research. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(1), 6-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1674358
Fonseca, D. R., Meneses, P. P. M., Silva, A. I. S., Filho, & Campos, N. G. (2013). Autonomia para gestão estratégica de pessoas no setor público federal: Perspectivas de análise e agenda de pesquisa. Revista de Administração Pública, 47(6), 1451-1475. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122013000600006
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman Editora.
Klein, F. A., & Mascarenhas, A. O. (2016). Motivação, satisfação profissional e evasão no serviço público: O caso da carreira de especialistas em Políticas Públicas e Gestão Governamental. Revista de Administração Pública, 50(1), 17-39. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612146562
Kossyva, D., Theriou, G., Aggelidis, V., & Sarigiannidis, L. (2023). Definitions and antecedents of engagement: A systematic literature review. Management Research Review, 46(5), 719-738. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-01-2021-0043
Kulikowski, K., & Sedlak, P. (2020). Can you buy work engagement? The relationship between pay, fringe benefits, financial bonuses and work engagement. Current Psychology, 39, 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9768-4
Magnan, E. D. S., Vazquez, A. C. S., Pacico, J. C., & Hutz, C. S. (2016). Normatização da versão brasileira da escala utrecht de engajamento no trabalho. Avaliação Psicológica, 15(2), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2016.1502.01
Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). Finding workable levers over work motivation: Comparing job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Administration & Society, 39(7), 803-832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707305546
Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A., & Wise, L. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an Agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681-690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.x
Rezende, F. C. (2009). Desafios gerenciais para a reconfiguração da administração burocrática Brasileira. Sociologias, (21), 344-365. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-45222009000100014
Ribeiro, C. V. S., & Mancebo, D. (2013). O servidor público no mundo do trabalho do século XXI. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 33(1), 192-207. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1414-98932013000100015
Schaufeli, W. B & Taris, W. T. (2014). A Critical review of the Job Demands-Resources model: Implications for improving work and health. In G. F. Bauer & O. Hämmig (Orgs.), Bridging Occupational, Organizational and Public Health: A Transdisciplinary Approach (pp. 43-66). NY: Springer.
Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). Employee engagement in theory and practice. In C. Truss, R. Delbridge, K. Alfes, A. Shantz, & E. Soane (Eds.), Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice (pp. 1-321). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203076965
Schaufeli, W. B. et al. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
Schaufeli. W. B., & De Witte, H. (2017). Work engagement in contrast to burnout: Real and redundant! Burnout Research, 5, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2017.06.001
Schneider, B., Yost, A. B., Kropp, A., Kind, C., & Lam, H. (2018). Workforce engagement: What it is, what drives it, and why it matters for organizational performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 462-480. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2244
Secchi, L. (2009). Modelos organizacionais e reformas da administração pública. Revista de Administração Pública, 43(2), 347-369. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-76122009000200004
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row Collins College Publishers.
Tuin, L., Schaufeli, W. B., Van den Broeck, A., & van Rhenen, W. (2020). A corporate purpose as an antecedent to employee motivation and work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572343
Vazquez, A. C. S., Magnan, E. S., Pacico, J. C., Hutz, C. S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Adaptation and validation of the brazilian version of the utrecht work engagement scale. Psico-USF, 20(2), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712015200202
Vieira, C. B., Vilas Boas, A. A., Andrade, R. O. B., & Oliveira, E. R. (2011). Motivação na Administração Pública: Considerações teóricas sobre a aplicabilidade dos pressupostos das teorias motivacionais na esfera pública. Revista ADMpg Gestão Estratégica, 4(1), 1-18.
Wright, B. E. (2007). Public service and motivation: Does mission matter? Public Administration Review, 67(1), 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00696.x
Zahari, N., & Kaliannan, M. (2022). Antecedents of work engagement in the public sector: A systematic literature review. Review of Public Personnel Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X221106792
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista: apenas para a 1a. publicação
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
The authors, while doing the submission, accept the notice below:
We authors hold the copyright related to our paper and transfer Contextus journal the right for the first publication with a Creative Commons’ international license of the modality Attribution – Non-commercial 4.0, which in turn allows the paper to be shared providing that both the authorship and the journal’s right for initial release are acknowledged.
Furthermore, we are aware of our permission to take part in additional contracts independently for non-exclusive distribution of the version of our work published in this journal (e.g. publishing it in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), while acknowledging both the authorship and the journal’s initial publication.
We also certify that the paper is original and up to this date has not been released in any other journal, Brazilian or of another nationality, either in Portuguese or another language, as well as it has not been sent for simultaneous publication in other journals.
Last, we not only know that plagiarism is not tolerated by Contextus but also certify the paper presents the sources of passages from cited works, including those authored by ourselves.
