On two ways to expand on the harm principle

Autores/as

Palabras clave:

John Stuart Mill. Harm Principle. Public opinion. Liberalism.

Resumen

In this article I survey the historical antecedents of what has been commonly referred to as John Stuart Mill´s Harm Principle and some of the ways in which the principle has been discussed in the work of recent analytic philosophers. Subsequently, in the article`s substantive core, I focus entirely on what Mill refers to as the “moral coercion of public opinion”. Here I address matters which I take to underexplored in the literature, namely some difficulties that arise for Mill´s treatment in connection with our ordinary notions concerning politeness and social avoidance. Though the problem of avoidance has been addressed by Dan Threet and John Dilulio, among others, I believe that my approach to the problems created by Mill`s take on politeness is entirely original with me. Considering the foregoing, I propose adding two supplementary clauses to the Harm Principle. I conclude by presenting a modern statement of said principle.

Biografía del autor/a

Rodrigo Jungmann de Castro, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)

Doutorado em Filosofia pela University of California, Riverside, onde também desempenhou atividades de ensino. Atualmente é Professor Adjunto II na Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE).

Citas

CAPALDI, N. John Stuart Mill: a Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

CONSTANT, B. Principles of Politics Applicable to All Governments. Trad. de Dennis O’ Keefe. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2003.

DEMETRIOU, K. N.; LOIZIDES, A. John Stuart Mill: a British Socrates. Palgrave: Macmillan, 2013.

DILULIO, J. P. Completely free: the moral and political vision of John Stuart Mill. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022.

DWORKIN, G. “Paternalism”. The Monist v. 56, n. 1, 1972, p. 64-84.

FEINBERG, J. Harm to Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.

FEINBERG, J. Harm to Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.

FEINBERG, J. Harmless Wrongdoing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.

FEINBERG, J. Offense to Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.

FOLLAND, A. The Harm Principle and the Nature of Harm. Utilitas, v. 34, 2022, p. 139-153.

HUMBOLDT, W. von. The limits of state action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

LOCKE, J. Two Treatises of Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.

MILL, J. S. Autobiography (1873). In: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. v. 1. New York: Routledge, 2008.

MILL, J. S. “Civilization” (1836). In: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. v. 18. New York: Routledge, 2014.

MILL, J. S. “Coleridge” (1840). In: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. v. 10. New York: Routledge, 2014.

MILL, J. S. On Liberty. (1859). In: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, v. 18. New York: Routledge, 2014.

MILL, J. S. “Perfectibility” (1829). In: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. John M. Robson (Ed), v. 26. New York: Routledge, 2016.

MILL, J. S. The Principles of Political Economy (1848). In: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. v. 3. New York: Routledge, 2009.

MILTON, J. Areopagitica and other writings. London: Penguin Classics, 2016.

RILEY, J. Mill’s on Liberty. New York: Routledge, 1998.

RILEY, J. Mill’s on Liberty. 2. ed. New York: Routledge, 2015.

THREET, D. Mill’s Social Pressure Puzzle. Social Theory and Press, v. 44, n. 4, 2018, p. 539-565.

TOCQUEVILLE, A. de. Democracy in America. Trad. Harvey Mansfield e Delba Winthrop. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2000.

TURNER, P. N. Harm and Mill’s Harm Principle, Ethics, v. 124, n. 2, 2014, p. 299-326.

Publicado

2024-12-31

Número

Sección

Artigos