Cuidado pré-operatório para pacientes em estágio terminal de doença na perspectiva dos enfermeiros

Natália de Luna Leite; Andellyhose Clébia Lima dos Santos; Amanda Carla Borba de Souza Cavalcanti; Aracele Tenório de Almeida e Cavalcanti; Eduardo Tavares Gomes; Vilanice Alves de Araújo Püschel

doi:10.15253/2175-6783.20222381328

Authors

Natália de Luna Leite Universidade Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9830-4031
Andellyhose Clébia Lima dos Santos Universidade Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9745-0176
Amanda Carla Borba de Souza Cavalcanti Universidade Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6970-6947
Aracele Tenório de Almeida e Cavalcanti Universidade Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8134-5438
Eduardo Tavares Gomes Universidade Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9506-5303
Vilanice Alves de Araújo Püschel Universidade de São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-3876

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20222381328

Keywords:

Palliative Care; Bioethics; Perioperative Nursing; Nursing Care; Grounded Theory.

Abstract

Objective: to understand the meanings attributed by nurses to preoperative care provided to terminal disease patients. Methods: qualitative research that used the Grounded Theory as methodological reference and was conducted in the surgical wards of a university hospital. Results: eleven nurses participated in the research. A theory was elaborated for the central phenomenon: Nurses caring for terminal disease patients in the preoperative period in the context of a surgical ward. Conclusion: nurses attribute meanings to this care that has its own particularities, that requires professional preparation and that demands, even more, an effective communication within the multidisciplinary team and in the relationship with the patient and family. Contributions to practice: the theory presented allows professionals to reflect on their praxis, understand the intervening conditions for ethical dilemmas and conflicts involved and consequences, as well as strategies to improve care in this scenario.

Author Biography

Eduardo Tavares Gomes, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

References

Samperio CG, Canizales RR, Rodríguez SA, Zepeda HR, Hall RT, Camino BG. Palliative medicine in surgery. Cir Cir. 2017;85(2):186-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.circir.2016.10.027

Arrieira ICO, Thofehrn MB, Porto AR, Moura PMM, Martins CL, Jacondino MB. Spirituality in palliative care: experiences of an interdisciplinary team. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018;52:e03312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-220x2017007403312

Ballou JH, Brasel KJ. Palliative care and geriatric surgery. Clin Geriatr Med. 2019;35(1):35-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2018.08.004

Paiva CF, Santos TCF, Montenegro HRA, Martins RCGCS, Almeida Filho AJ. Reconfiguration of palliative oncological nursing care: nursing contributions. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(6):e20190384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0384

Andrews T, Mariano GJS, Santos JLG, Koerber-Timmons K, Silva FH. The methodology of classic Grounded Theory: considerations on its application in nursing research. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2017;26(4):e1560017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-070720170001560017

Mairink APAR, Gradim CVC, Panobianco MS. The use of the qualitative methodology of the Grounded Theory in Nursing research. Esc Anna Nery. 2021;25(3):e20200494 doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2020-0494

Moura CO, Silva IR, Silva TP, Santos KA, Crespo MCA, Silva MM. Methodological path to reach the degree of saturation in qualitative research: grounded theory. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022;75(2):e20201379. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-1379

Ollaik LG, Ziller HM. Conceptions of validity in qualitative studies. Educ Pesqui. 2012;38(1):229-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022012005000002

Newsome K, Sauder M, Spardy J, Kodadek L, Ang D, Michetti CP, et al. Palliative care in the trauma and surgical critical care settings: a narrative review. Am Surg. 2022;31348221101597. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00031348221101597

Lilley EJ, Cooper Z, Schwarze ML, Mosenthal AC. Palliative care in surgery: defining the research priorities. J Palliat Med. 2017;20(7):702-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2017.0079

Kan CG, Nurok M. The ethics of interventional procedures for patients too ill for surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018;31(2):190-4. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000558

Lilley EJ, Lindvall C, Lillemoe KD, Tulsky JA, Wiener DC, Cooper Z. Measuring processes of care in palliative surgery: a novel approach using natural language processing. Ann Surg. 2018;267(5):823-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002579

Hamilton TD, Selby D, Tsang ME, Kim A, Wright FC. Patients' perceptions of palliative surgical procedures: a qualitative analysis. Ann Palliat Med. 2017;6(Suppl 1):77-84. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/apm.2017.01.04

Nabozny MJ, Kruser JM, Steffens NM, Pecanac KE, Brasel KJ, Chittenden EH, et al. Patient-reported limitations to surgical buy-in: a qualitative study of patients facing high-risk surgery. Ann Surg. 2017;265(1):97-102. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001645

Gulini JEHMB, Nascimento ERP, Moritz RD, Rosa LM, Silveira NR, Vargas MAO. Intensive care unit team perception of palliative care: the discourse of the collective subject. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2017;51:e03221. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2016041703221

Quinn TD, Wolczynski P, Sroka R, Urman RD. Creating a pathway for multidisciplinary shared decision-making to improve communication during preoperative assessment. Anesthesiol Clin. 2018;36(4):635-62. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2018.07.011

Roo AC, Vitous CA, Rivard SJ, Bamdad MC, Jafri SM, Byrnes ME, et al. High-risk surgery among older adults: Not-quite shared decision-making. Surgery. 2021;170(3):756-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.005

Hahne P, Lundström S, Leveälahti H, Winnhed J, Öhlén J. Changes in professionals' beliefs following a palliative care implementation programme at a surgical department: a qualitative evaluation. BMC Palliat Care. 2017;16(1):77. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0262-4