Qualidade metodológica da validação de estudos sobre cenários simulados em enfermagem

Juliana da Silva Garcia Nascimento; Fabiana Cristina Pires; Kleiton Gonçalves do Nascimento; Daniela da Silva Garcia Regino; Tainá Vilhar Siqueira; Maria Celia Barcellos Dalri

doi:10.15253/2175-6783.20212262459

Authors

Juliana da Silva Garcia Nascimento Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1118-2738
Fabiana Cristina Pires Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8524-1449
Kleiton Gonçalves do Nascimento Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2717-6837
Daniela da Silva Garcia Regino Universidade Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-7783
Tainá Vilhar Siqueira Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1161-5620
Maria Celia Barcellos Dalri Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8173-8642

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20212262459

Keywords:

Nursing; Simulation Technique; Education, Nursing; Learning; Validation Study.

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the quality of the validation process performed in studies that developed simulated clinical scenarios for teaching and learning in nursing. Methods: the researchers conducted two steps: an integrative review in the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Educational Resources Information Center databases; and the validation assessment, using the validated tool (Quality Assessment for Validity Studies). Results: 561 studies were identified, six of which comprised the sample, primary, methodological, available electronically and in full. Most showed good validation quality by meeting almost all the criteria required by the tool. Conclusion: the validation of studies on clinical scenarios was able to support reliable evidence for adoption in teaching through simulation in nursing.

References

Hanshaw SL, Dickerson SS. High fidelity simulation evaluation studies in nursing education: a review of the literature. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020; 46:102818. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102818

Lubbers J, Rossman C. Satisfaction and self-confidence with nursing clinical simulation: Novice learners, medium-fidelity, and community settings. Nurse Educ Today. 2017; 48:140-4. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.10.010

Bortolato-Major C, Mantovani MF, Felix JVC, Boostel R, Silva ATM, Caravaca-Morera JA. Debriefing eva- luation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019; 72(3):788-94. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0103

International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: simulationSM simulation design. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016; 12(suppl):S-S12. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.005

Tyerman J, Luctkar-Flude M, Graham L, Coffey S, Olsen-Lynch E. A systematic review of health care presimulation preparation and briefing effectiveness. Clin Simul Nurs. 2019; 27:12-25. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.11.002

Leigh G, Steuben F. Setting learners up for success: Presimulation and prebriefing strategies. Teach Learn Nurs. 2018; 13:185-9. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2018.03.004

Nascimento JSG, Costa ABF, Sangiovani JC, Silva TCS, Regino DSG, Dalri MCB. Pre-simulation, pre-briefing or briefing in nursing simulation: what are the differences? Rev Eletr Enferm. 2020; 22:60171. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.5216/ree.v22.60171

Oliveira SN, Massaroli A, Martini JG, Rodrigues J. From theory to practice, operating the clinical simulation in Nursing teaching. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018; 71(Suppl 4):1791-8. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0180

Adib-Hajbaghery M, Sharifi N. Effect of simulation training on the development of nurses and nursing students’ critical thinking: a systematic literature review. Nurse Educ Today. 2017; 50:17-24. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.011

Eyikara E, Baykara GZ. The importance of simulation in nursing education. World J Educ Technol [Internet]. 2017 [cited Jan 19, 2021];9(1):2-7. Avai- lable from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1141174

Kaneko RMU, Lopes MHBM. Realistic health care simulation scenario: what is relevant for its design? Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2019; 53:e03453. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2018015703453

Olaussen C, Heggdal K, Tvedt CR. Elements in scenario based simulation associated with nursing students’ self‐confidence and satisfaction: a cross sectional study. Nurs Open. 2020; 7(1):170-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.375

Mazzo A, Miranda FBG, Meska MHG, Bianchini A, Bernardes RM, Pereira Junior GA. Teaching of pressure injury prevention and treatment using simulation. Esc Anna Nery. 2018; 22(1):e20170182. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2017-0182

Fabri RP, Mazzo A, Martins JCA, Fonseca AS, Pedersoli CE, Miranda FBG, et al. Development of a theoretical-practical script for clinical simulation. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2017; 51:e03218. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2016016403218

Andrade PON, Oliveira SC, Morais SCRV, Guedes TG, Melo GP, Linhares FMP. Validation of a clinical simulation setting in the management of post partum haemorrhage. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019; 72(3):624-31. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0065

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. 2020. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2

Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005; 52(5):546-53. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Santos CM, Pimenta CA, Nobre MR. The pico strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem. 2007; 15(3):508-11. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692007000300023

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016; 5(1):210. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

Ursi ES, Galvão CM. Perioperative prevention of skin injury: an integrative literature review. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem. 2006; 14(1):124-31. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692006000100017

Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Pippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.

Minayo MC. Sampling and saturation in qualitative research: consensuses and controversies. Rev Pesqui Qual [Internet]. 2017 [cited Jan 19, 2021];5(7):1-12. Available from: https://editora.sepq.org.br/index.php/rpq/article/view/82/59

Gore S, Goldberg A, Huang, MH, Shoemaker M, Blackwood J. Development and validation of a quality appraisal tool for validity studies (QAVALS). Physiother. Theory Practic. 2019; 1-9. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2019.1636435

Jung JL, Hyeon-Cheol J, Kyung-Ah K, Ye-Jean K, Myung-Nam L. Development of a simulation scenario and evaluation checklist for patients with asthma in emergency care. Comp Inform Nu. 2015; 33(12):546-54. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000193

Eduardo AHA, Mendes AA, Binotto CCS, Tognoli SH, Tucci AMGB. Scenario for a simulation of health services’ waste: a methodological study. Online Braz J Nurs [Internet]. 2016 [cited Jan 19, 2021]; 15(4):611-6. Available from: http://www.objnursing.uff.br/index.php/nursing/article/view/5672

Negri EC, Pereira GA Júnior, Cotta Filho CK, Franzon JC, Mazzo A. Construction and validation of simulated scenario for nursing care to colostomy patients. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2019; 28:e20180199. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2018-0199

Souza RS, Oliveira PP, Dias AAL, Simão DAS, Peli- zari AEB, Figueiredo RM. Prevention of infections associated with peripheral catheters: construction and validation of clinical scenario. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020; 73(5):e20190390. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0390

Crestani AH, Moraes AB, Souza APR. Content validation: clarity/relevance, reliability and internal consistency of enunciative signs of language acquisition. CoDAS. 2017; 29(4):e20160180. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/201720160180

Nora CRD, Zoboli E, Vieira MM. Validation by experts: importance in translation and adaptation of instruments. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2017; 38(3):e64851. doi: http://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2017.03.64851